In over 16-day hearing in Sabarimala reference case, the Supreme Court heard the issues ranging from judicial review, ...
Supreme Court asserts that religious reform must come from within, not through judicial intervention, in Sabarimala case review.
A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court questioned the “essential religious practices” doctrine during hearings in the ...
After a marathon hearing of 16 days in the Sabarimala reference case, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court, led by Chief ...
The Supreme Court of India observed that excessive litigation over religious practices could overwhelm courts while hearing ...
The Supreme Court made the observation while discussing the interplay between Articles 15, 16, 25 and 26 of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court, hearing the Sabarimala reference, questioned the Young Lawyers Association on their latest public interest ...
The Supreme Court emphasized that religious institutions must operate under established norms, not anarchy, while hearing cases related to women's entry at places of worship. A nine-judge bench stated ...
On the 13th day of hearing in the Sabarimala reference case, the Supreme Court on Thursday observed that courts interfering ...
The Supreme Court criticised the original 2006 PIL, suggesting it was improperly filed and highlighted the potential misuse of Public Interest Litigation.
The Supreme Court was hearing petitions related to discrimination against women at religious places, including the Sabarimala Temple in Kerala.
The top court observed that the PIL was an "abuse of process of law" and the association should work for the bar and the ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results